Consumer views of community pharmacy services in Bangalore city, India
Main Article Content
Keywords
Community Pharmacy Services, Consumer Satisfaction, Professional Practice, India
Abstract
Objective: The opinion about pharmacy services was studied using an instrument which measured satisfaction with pharmacy services. The main focus of the instrument was to assess patients’ opinion and expectation of the present pharmacy services.
Method: The instrument contained 20 items, which were grouped based on their similarity into eight dimensions, namely, General satisfaction, Interpersonal Skill, Evaluation, Gathering non-medical information, Trust, Helping Patients, Explanation, and Finance. Chance random sampling was done and the participants were the general public above the age of 18 years. The main outcome measure was to study participants’ opinion regarding the current and desired pharmacy services. Descriptive statistics are presented for the satisfaction dimension score. The level of satisfaction with the different dimensions was compared across the different demographic characteristics.
Result: The study results revealed significant difference in the General satisfaction and Interpersonal skill amongst the gender. Significant difference was seen in the Helping patients, Evaluation and Explanation skill among the various age groups. Education background showed significant difference in evaluation, Gathering-non-medical information, Helping patients and Explanation skills of the pharmacist. There was an overall satisfaction dimension score of 56.83% in the current practice and 68.83% in the desired practice.
Conclusion: Awareness about pharmacy service continuing education programme for practicing pharmacist will heighten the pharmacy profession in our country.
References
2. Farris KB, Stenton SB, Samnani M, Samycia D. How satisfied are your patients? Can Pharm J. 2000;133(8):32-36.
3. Aharony L, Strasser S. Patient satisfaction: What we know about and what we will need to explore. Med Care Rev. 1993;50(1): 49-79.
4. William B. Patient Satisfaction: A Valid Concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(4): 509-516.
5. Rossiter L, Langwell K, Wan T, Rvnyak M. Patient satisfaction among elderly enrollees and disenrollees in Medicare health maintenance organizations. Results from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation. JAMA.1989;262:57-63.
6. Schommer J, Kucukarsalan S. Measuring patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997;54:2721-2732.
7. Dearmin J, Brenner J, Miglini R. Reportig on QI efforts for internal and external customers. J Quality Improv. 1995;21: 277-288.
8. Hargie O, Morrow N, Woodman C. Consumer perceptions of and attitudes to community pharmacy services. Pharm J 1992; 249:688-691.
9. Clerfeuille F, Poubanne Y, Vakrilova M, Petrova G. Evaluation of the consumer’s satisfaction using the tetra-class model. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008; 4(3):258-271.
10. Marquis M, Daves A, Ware J. Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Med Care. 1983;21:821-829.
11. Crosby L, Evans K, Cowles D. Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. J Marketing. 1990;54:68-81.
12. Ware JE Jr, Wright WR, Snyder MK, Chu GC. Consumer perceptions of health care services: implications for academic medicine. J Med Educ. 1975;50:839-848.
13. Ross C, Frommelt AG, Hazelwood L. The role of expectations in patient satisfaction with medical care. J Health Care Market. 1987;7:16-26.
14. Mackowiak JI, Manasse HR Jr. Expectation for ambulatory services in traditional and office practice pharmacist. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984;41:1140-1146.
15. David R. Mottram, James L. Ford, Brenna Markey, Kay Mitchelson. Public perceptions of community pharmacy. Pharm J. 1989;243: R 14-17.
16. Barwani S, Panton R, Morley A. Survey of public opinion about the community pharmacist as a source of health advice. Pharm J. 1987;239:R15.
17. Volume CI, Farris KB, Kassam R, Cox CE, Cave A. Pharmaceutical care research and education project: patient outcomes. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2001;41(3):411-420.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.