Pharmacist-led evaluation of a novel nail-cutting innovation versus conventional trimming in hemiplegic patients: A Randomized controlled trial

Main Article Content

Janyut Srihirun
Sudarat Isaravisavakul
Prayuth Poowaruttanawiwit

Keywords

hemiplegia, assistive device, nail trimming, randomized controlled trial, patient independence

Abstract

Background: Hemiplegic patients often have trouble maintaining nail hygiene due to unilateral hand dysfunction, increasing the risk of perionychial injury, infection, and reduced quality of life. Assistive devices enabling safe, independent nail trimming may address these challenges while supporting preventive health strategies. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel one-handed, electrically powered nail-cutting device compared with conventional manual clippers in hemiplegic patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Naresuan University Hospital in two phases: preliminary testing in healthy volunteers (n=10) and clinical evaluation in hemiplegic patients (n=20). Participants were randomized to use either the novel device or conventional clippers. Primary outcomes were trimming quality (shape uniformity, smoothness of edges) and safety (incidence of perionychial injury, pain scores). Secondary outcomes included user satisfaction and completion time. Randomization, independent allocation, standardized training, and blinded outcome assessment were employed to enhance internal validity. Results: In hemiplegic patients, the novel device achieved smoother nail edges, preserved nail integrity, and significantly reduced pain compared with conventional clippers (mean difference in pain score: –0.68; 95% CI: –1.28 to –0.08). No perionychial injuries occurred in the intervention group. Satisfaction scores were consistently high, with participants reporting enhanced self-esteem and perceived safety. Similar performance and safety were observed in healthy volunteers. Conclusion: The novel one-handed electric nailcutting device demonstrated superior efficacy, safety, and user satisfaction compared with conventional clippers in hemiplegic patients. While findings are promising, larger multi-center trials with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these results and assess cost-effectiveness and long-term adherence.

Abstract 90 | PDF Downloads 44

References

1. Poomalai G, Prabhakar S, Sirala Jagadesh N. Functional ability and health problems of stroke survivors: an explorative study. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33375. doi:10.7759/cureus.33375.
2. Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, Hyacinth HI, Awosika OO, Kissela BM, Feng W. Early rehabilitation after stroke: a narrative review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19(12):59. doi:10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6.
3. Zhou H, Han Y, Xie D, Zheng K, Zhou Z, Zhu H, Ji Y. Predictors and clinical implications of post-stroke cognitive impairment: a retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):24198. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-08048-5.
4. Lee HS, Sohn MK, Lee J, Kim DY, Shin YI, Oh GJ, Lee YS, Joo MC, Lee SY, Song MK, Han J, Ahn J, Lee YH, Kim DH, Kim YT, Kim YH, Chang WH. Long-term functional outcomes in patients with isolated cerebellar infarction: the KOSCO study. Front Neurol. 2025;16:1541245. doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1541245.
5. Siragusa M, Schepis C, Cosentino FI, Spada RS, Toscano G, Ferri R. Nail pathology in patients with hemiplegia. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144(3):557-560. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04083.x.
6. Gül U, Cakmak SK, Ozel S, Bingöl P, Kaya K. Skin disorders in patients with hemiplegia and paraplegia. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(8):681-683. doi:10.2340/16501977-0394.
7. Xiong J, Wang JT, Lin S, Xie BY. Advances in hemiplegia rehabilitation: modern therapeutic interventions to enhance activities of daily living. Front Neurol. 2025;16:1555990. doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1555990.
8. Taberna M, Gil Moncayo F, Jané-Salas E, Antonio M, Arribas L, Vilajosana E, Peralvez Torres E, Mesía R. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Front Oncol. 2020;10:85. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00085.
9. Ki V, Rotstein C. Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections in adults: a review of their epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and site of care. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2008;19(2):173-184. doi:10.1155/2008/846453.
10. Abdullah L, Abbas O. Common nail changes and disorders in older people: diagnosis and management. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(2):173-181.
11. Stepanian N, Larsen MH, Mendelsohn JB, Mariussen KL, Heggdal K. Empowerment interventions designed for persons living with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of components and efficacy of format on patient-reported outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):911. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09895-6.
12. Carhart C, Ciechowski R, Groat D, Stevans A. Development of a one-handed nail clipper for stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(2):156-159. doi:10.1310/tsr1502-156.
13. Cheong MJ, Kang Y, Kang HW. Psychosocial factors related to stroke patients’ rehabilitation motivation: a scoping review and meta-analysis focused on South Korea. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(9):1211. doi:10.3390/healthcare9091211.
14. Lee DK, Lipner SR. Optimal diagnosis and management of common nail disorders. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):694-712. doi:10.1080/07853890.2022.2044511.
15. Reinecke JK, Hinshaw MA. Nail health in women. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020;6(2):73-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.01.006.
16. Tanacan E, Erdogan FG. Effect of nail disorders on quality of life scale scores: a prospective cross-sectional study from a tertiary referral center. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2024;114(3):21-208. doi:10.7547/21-208.

Most read articles by the same author(s)