Towards supporting scholarship in research by clinical pharmacy faculty

  • A. Simon Pickard
Keywords: Research Support, Education, pharmacy, Faculty, United States


Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the need for research support, faculty development, and topics of interest to clinical track pharmacy faculty that would facilitate scholarship in research.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of pharmacy practice-based faculty at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) completed via the web in November 2005.

Results: Of 39 clinical track faculty respondents (48% response rate), 100% indicated they were interested in being co-investigator or 77% lead investigator on a research grant proposal. The majority of respondents expressed “a lot” or “extreme” interest in receiving methodological guidance and administrative support in order to pursue research interests. The greatest interest in research support services related to sample size calculations, selection of appropriate statistical tests, grant writing, and writing for journals. Barriers to research cited by faculty included lack of confidence in ability, the need for balancing responsibilities, and reward for efforts. Suggestions included the creation of specific research interest groups, research seminars, formal mentoring and statistical support services.

Conclusions: Clinical-track faculty are interested in research-related scholarship but typically lack the confidence or skills to lead research. While this study was limited to UIC clinical faculty, UIC faculty are attracted from Colleges of Pharmacy across North America and it is notable that such barriers can be quickly identified using a brief web-based survey in order to inform a plan that provides resources and support for research by clinical pharmacy faculty.


Download data is not yet available.


1. College Vision and Mission, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy,, (Accessed December 1, 2005).

2. Mission Statement, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois College of Pharmacy., (Accessed December 1, 2005).

3. Mission Statement and Vision Statement, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy., (Accessed December 1, 2005).

4. Pharmacy Practice Department Information. University of Kansas., (Accessed December 1, 2005).

5. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University., (Accessed December 1, 2005).

6. Curtis P, Dickinson P, Steiner J, Lanphear B, Vu K. Building capacity for research in family medicine: is the blueprint faulty? Fam Med 2003;35(2):124-30.

7. Fang D, Meyer RE. PhD faculty in clinical departments of U.S. medical schools, 1981-1999: their widening presence and roles in research. Acad Med 2003;78(2):167-76.

8. Popovich NG, Abel SR. The need for a broadened definition of faculty scholarship and creativity. Am J Pharm Educ 2002;66:59-65.

9. Kennedy RH, Gubbins PO, Luer M, Reddy IK, Light KE. Developing and sustaining a culture of scholarship. Am J Pharm Educ 2003.

10. Commission to Implement Change in Pharmaceutical Education. The responsibility of pharmaceutical education for scholarship in graduate education, fellowships, and postgraduate professional education and training. Am J Pharm Educ 1993;57:386-99.

11. MacKinnon GE. Administrator and dean perceptions toward faculty development in academic pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ 2003;67(3)Article 97.
How to Cite
Pickard AS. Towards supporting scholarship in research by clinical pharmacy faculty. Pharm Pract (Granada) [Internet]. 2006Dec.12 [cited 2020Jan.19];4(4):191-4. Available from:
Original Research