Opinions of West Texas pharmacists about emergency contraception

  • Gary Sutkin
  • Brenda Grant
  • Brian K. Irons
  • Tyrone F. Borders
Keywords: Contraception, Postcoital, Pharmacists, Ethics, Pharmacy, United States

Abstract

Background: The pharmacist’s role in dispensing emergency contraception (EC) has become controversial due to the intersection of personal and professional ethics. Therefore, to examine the issue of EC availability, we surveyed a sample of West Texas pharmacists. West Texas is a religiously and politically conservative region where no methods of EC have been made available.

Objective: to survey a sample of pharmacists in West Texas about their experience, beliefs, and knowledge of EC both before and after a presentation of the current literature about EC.

Methods: We asked a convenience sample of 75 pharmacists about their experience, beliefs, and knowledge of EC both before and after a presentation of the current literature about EC.

Results: Sixty-four (85%) pharmacists agreed to complete the study questionnaire. None carries EC in his/her pharmacy, and scientific understanding of EC was generally poor. Fourteen percent stated EC conflicts with their religious views, 17% considered it a method of abortion, 11% would not be willing to fill an EC prescription written by a doctor. 58% would be willing to offer EC over the counter. The presentation encouraged more to offer it over the counter, but in general did not significantly change their beliefs.

Conclusion: Our sample of West Texas pharmacists demonstrated very little experience with, a general lack of knowledge about, and some personal and religious objections to EC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cantor J, Baum K. The limits of conscientious objection – may pharmacists refuse to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception? N Engl J Med 2004;351:2008-12.

2. Charo, RA. The celestial fire of conscience – refusing to delivery medical care. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2471-3.

3. Knecht L, Myrick M. Protesters fight pharmacy. Available at: http://www.ntdaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/02/03/40/401f3ebb7558e. Accessed February 5, 2004.

4. Glasier A. Emergency postcoital contraception. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1058-64.

5. Swahn ML, Westlund P, Johannisson E, Bygdeman, M. Effect of postcoital contraceptive methods on the endometrium and the menstrual cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:738-44.

6. Marions L, Cekan SZ, Bydgeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Effect of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or mifepristone on ovarian function. Contraception 2004;69:373-7.

7. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Marions L. Mechanisms of action of mifepristone and levonorgestrel when used for emergency contraception. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:341-8.

8. Kahlenborn C, Stanford JB, Larimore WL. Postfertilization effect of hormonal emergency contraception. Ann Pharmacother 2002;36:465-70.

9. Trussell J, Ellertson C, Dorflinger L. Effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception by cycle day of intercourse: implications for mechanism of action. Contraception 2003;67:167-71.

10. Emergency Oral Contraception. ACOG Practice Bulletin 2001; No 25. In: 2001 Compendium of Selected Publications. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2001; pp 462-33.

11. Calis KA. Pharmacists and emergency contraception. N Engl J Med 2005;352:942-3.

12. Davey M, Belluck P, Hart A, et al. Pharmacies balk on after-sex pill and widen fight. The New York Times. 2005 Apr 19;Sect A:1 (col. 1).

13. Harrison T. Availability of emergency contraception: a survey of hospital emergency department staff. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:105-10.

14. Beckman, LJ, Harvey M., Sherman CA, Petitti DB. Changes in providers’ views and practices about emergency contraception with education. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:942-6.

15. Foster DG, Landau SC, Monastersky N, Chung F, et al. Pharmacy access to emergency contraception in California. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2006;38:46-52.

16. Aiken AM, Gold MA, Parker AM. Changes in young women’s awareness, attitudes, and perceived barriers to using emergency contraception. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2005;18:25-32.

17. Sommers SD, Chaiyakunapruk N, Gardner JS, Winkler J. The emergency contraception collaborative prescribing experience in Washington State. J Am Pharm Assoc 2001;41:60-6.

18. Kumar AS, Hall LC, LePage A, Lim, PC. Providing emergency contraceptive pills “behind-the-counter”: opinions among Minnesota healthcare providers. Contraception 2003;68:253-9.

19. Borrego ME, Short J, House N, Gupchup G, et al. New Mexico pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards prescribing oral emergency contraception. J Am Pharm Assoc 2006;46:33-43.

20. U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/SUB-EST2004-4.html. (Accessed January 5, 2006).

21. Ratanajamit C, Chongsuvivatwong V. Survey of knowledge and practice on oral contraceptive and emergency contraceptive pills of drugstore personnel in Hat Yai, Thailand. Pharmcoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001;10:149-156.

22. Ralph SG, Preston A, Clarke J. Over-the-counter advice for genital problems: the role of the community pharmacist. Int J STD AIDS 2001;12:513-5.

23. Greenberger M, Vogelstein R. Pharmasict refusals: A threat to women’s health. Science 2005;308:1557-8.

24. Summary Of State Actions Related To Pharmacist Refusals. Available at: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/media/factsreports/fact-050418-pharmacist-refusals.xml. (Accessed January 5, 2006).

25. State policies in brief: Refusing to provide health services. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute, September 1, 2004. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RPHS.pdf (Accessed January 5, 2006).

26. Manasse HR Jr. Conscientious objection and the pharmacist. Science 2005;308:1558-9.

27. Rodrigues I, Grou F, Joly J. Effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:531-7.

28. Sucato GS, Gardner JS, Koepsell TD. Adolescents’ use of emergency contraception provided by Washington State pharmacists. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2001;14:163-9.

29. Jones RK, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK. Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001. Perspect on Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:294-303.

30. Raine TR, Harper CC, Rocca CH, et al. Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293:54-62.

31. Iffy L. Emergency contraception: politics trumps science at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1103-4.

32. Stammers T. Emergency contraception from pharmacists misses opportunity. BMJ 2001;322:1245.

33. Stenchever, MA, Droegemueller W, Herbst AL, Mishell, DR, Jr. Comprehensive Gynecology. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p 296.

34. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Lancet 1998;352:428-33.

35. Glasier A., Baird D. The effects of self-administering emergency contraception. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1-4.

36. Where can a woman go? Reproductive services in Texas hospitals. A Project of Access Texas and the TARAL Education Fund; 2001.
Published
2006-12-12
How to Cite
1.
Sutkin G, Grant B, Irons BK, Borders TF. Opinions of West Texas pharmacists about emergency contraception. Pharm Pract (Granada) [Internet]. 2006Dec.12 [cited 2019Aug.24];4(4):151-5. Available from: https://pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/269
Section
Original Research