Journal publications by pharmacy practice faculty evaluated by institution and region of the United States (2001-2003)
Objective: To compare the quantity of manuscripts published in journals by departments of pharmacy practice at schools and colleges of pharmacy in the United States for the years 2001-2003.
Methods: We utilized the Web of Science bibliographic database to identify publication citations for the years 2001 to 2003 which were then evaluated in a number of different ways. Faculty were identified via American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy rosters for 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003 academic years.
Results: Rankings were done based on the number of publications per institution and average number of publications per faculty member at an institution. Upon linear regression analysis, a relationship exists between an institution’s faculty size and the total number of publications but not for tenure/nontenure-track faculty ratio. Rating highest in overall publication number did not guarantee high rankings in the average number of publications per faculty member at an institution assessment. Midwestern schools were responsible for more publications per institution than other regions. Many schools only generated minimal scholarship over this evaluative period.
Conclusion: While many schools have pharmacy practice faculty that strongly contributed to the biomedical literature, other schools have not. Pharmacy practice faculty in the Midwest publish more journal manuscripts than faculty in other regions of the country. More pharmacy schools need to engage their faculty in scholarly endeavors by providing support and incentives.
2. Miller KW. College and school of pharmacy NIH funding patterns, 1992-2003. AACP Institutional Research Brief Number 3 (2004). Accessed at www.aacp.org/Docs/MainNavigation/InstitutionalData/5946_IRBNo3-NIHFunding1992-2003.pdf (accessed September 13, 2006).
3. Meyer S, Patton JM, McSherry EM, for the AACP Institutional Research System. AACP 2004-2005 Profile of Pharmacy Faculty. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. 2004. Pg 1-66. Accessed at: www.aacp.org/Docs/MainNavigation/InstitutionalData/6420_PPF0405.pdf (accessed September 13, 2006).
4. Popovich NG, Abel SR. The need for a broadened definition of faculty scholarship and creativity. Am J Pharm Ed 2002;66:59-65.
The authors hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey to Pharmacy Practice: (1) the right to grant permission to republish or reprint the stated material, in whole or in part, without a fee; (2) the right to print pr epublish copies for free distribution or sale; and (3) the right to republish the stated material in any format (electronic or printed). In addition, the undersigned affirms that the article described above has not previously been published, in whole or part, is not subject to copyright or other rights except by the author(s), and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere, except as communicated in writing to Pharmacy Practice with this document.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Author Self-Archiving Policy
Pharmacy Practice permits and encourages authors to post and archive the final pdf of the articles submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit its publication in this journal.