Training upcoming academicians through interviews of pharmacy resident teaching certificate leaders
Background: Discovering methods of Residency Teaching Certificate Programs (RTCPs) will allow for collaboration in developing best practices to ensure both high quality of programming and outcomes for participants.
Objective: The primary objective of this project is to describe and compare how RTCPs are conducted in the state of Ohio. Secondarily, to identify current practices in assessing RTCPs in both programmatic effectiveness and individual resident teaching outcomes.
Methods: The seven coordinators of the seven Ohio RTCPs (n=7) were contacted via email and asked to participate in an IRB-approved interview, either in-person or telephonically. Standardized questions were developed to inquire about six categories of interest: demographics/background, administration/logistics, content, assessment of the resident, program financing, and program continuous quality improvement (CQI). All seven programs participated in interviews. Data was coded by multiple members of the research team for presentation in aggregate form.
Results: RTCPs include seminar days at the respective pharmacy colleges; however, the number, length, and content of seminars vary. The majority of programs (n=5) stated using inherited curriculum and materials passed down from previous coordinators. While each RTCP requires participants to submit a teaching portfolio, only three of seven programs assess the summative portfolios. All programs (n=7) award participants a certificate based on completion of requirements without a defined minimum performance standard. Two programs are collecting participant feedback after every session for CQI however no programs are completing an annual programmatic assessment of resident outcomes. The majority of coordinators (n=7) are interested in collaborating and sharing “best practices” between RTCPs in the state.
Conclusions: Although published and available resources exist surrounding the development and delivery of RTCPs, in Ohio, their use varies greatly. The most striking outcomes highlighted the lack of resident and program assessment of outcomes in RTCPs. The research has brought forth ideas of ways to improve these programs through resident assessment, program assessment and also leads to reflection and innovation around the best way to deliver these programs.
Academic pharmacy’s vital statistics. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Available at: https://www.aacp.org/article/academic-pharmacys-vital-statistics (accessed Sep 17, 2019).
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP accreditation standard for postgraduate year one (PGY1) pharmacy residency programs. Available at: https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/professional-development/residencies/docs/pgy1-residency-accreditation-standard-2016.ashx?la=en&hash=9FF7C76962C10562D567F73184FAA45BA7E186CB (accessed Sep 17, 2019).
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Guidance document for the ASHP accreditation standard for postgraduate year one (PGY1) pharmacy residency programs. Available at: https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/professional-development/residencies/docs/guidance-document-PGY1-standards.ashx?la=en&hash=23ED7EE0D27EEDADF11B7FEE9E2B207D9B04BCFA (accessed Sep 17, 2019).
Romanelli F, Smith KM, Brandt BF. Teaching residents how to teach: a scholarship of teaching and learning certificate program (STLC) for pharmacy residents. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(5):88. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710588
Castellani V, Haber SL, Ellis SC. Evaluation of a teaching certificate program for pharmacy residents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(10):1037-1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/60.10.1037
Falter RA, Arrendale JR. Benefits of a teaching certificate program for pharmacy residents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(21):1905-1906. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp080649
Gettig JP, Sheehan AH. Perceived value of a pharmacy resident teaching certificate program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(5):104. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7205104
Havrda DE, Engle JP, Anderson KC, Ray SM, Haines SL, Kane-Gill SL, Ballard SL, Crannage AJ, Rochester CD, Parman MG. Guidelines for resident teaching experiences. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33(7):e147-e161. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1250
Wright EA, Brown B, Gettig J, Martello JL, McClendon KS, Smith KM, et al. Teaching and learning curriculum programs: recommendations for postgraduate pharmacy experiences in education. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(15):1292-1302. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp130657
Strang AF, Baia P. An investigation of teaching and learning programs in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(4):59. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80459
Engle JP, Franks AM, Ashjian E, Bingham AL, Burke JM, Erstad BL, Haines SL, Hilaire ML, Rager ML, Wienbar R.A self-assessment guide for resident teaching experience. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(6):e58-e79. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1768
Copyright (c) 2020 Pharmacy Practice and the Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors hereby transfer, assign or otherwise convey to Pharmacy Practice (1) the right to grant permission to republish or reprint the stated material, in whole or in part, without a fee; (2) the right to print or epublish copies for free distribution or sale; and (3) the right to republish the stated material in any format (electronic or printed). In addition, the undersigned affirms that the article described above has not previously been published, in whole or part, is not subject to copyright or other rights except by the author(s), and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere, except as communicated in writing to Pharmacy Practice with this document.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Author Self-Archiving Policy
Pharmacy Practice permits and encourages authors to post and archive the final PDFs of their respective articles submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit its publication in this journal.