Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development

Main Article Content

Machelle Davison
Melissa S. Medina
Nancy E. Ray


Education, Pharmacy, Graduate, Internship, Nonmedical, United States


Objectives: New guidelines require preceptors to deliver approximately 30% of the doctor of pharmacy curricula. With preceptor’s increasing responsibilities, colleges are faced with the task of training preceptors as educators. Identifying preceptor’s training format preferences (i.e. electronic vs. live) should contribute to the more effective and efficient creation of training materials and programs.

Methods: A preceptor training video was created and made available electronically and was distributed to 400 preceptors with a brief 2-part questionnaire about preceptor training preferences, electronic training preferences after viewing the video, and available technology resources for participating in electronic training.

Results: 38.25% of the questionnaires were returned. The majority of respondents (57%) preferred electronic to live preceptor developing training and the majority (53%) had not previously attended the live annual preceptor development conference offered by the college. 51.6% participants reviewed the electronic training video created by the OU College of Pharmacy. Of the respondents who did not watch the video, 73% cited having too little time, problems accessing the video, or technical reasons for not watching the training video. The majority of responders in all age groups preferred electronic training to face-to-face training except those ages 61-65 and the majority (55.7%) would participate in on-line training again in the future. The majority of respondents have the technical resources to participate in electronic training.

Conclusion: Preceptors have limited time to participate in preceptor development training, although they view training as an important activity. This study reveals three main findings: (1) the majority of preceptors prefer electronic preceptor development training programs regardless of age; (2) would participate in future electronic training after having participated in electronic training; and (3) have the available resources to participate in electronic training. Future preceptor development programs should have flexible formats to accommodate preferences for live and electronic programming.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 724 | PDF Downloads 762


1. Knapp DA. Professionally Determined Need for Services in 2020. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(4);421-429.

2. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Academic Pharmacy’s Vital Statistics July 2006. Available at: (accessed February 26, 2007).

3. Boyle CJ, Carr-Lopez S, Kawahara NE, Kieser MA. See, CJ, Smith, GB. Report of the Preceptor Development Task Force Subcommittee Two. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66;42S-43S.

4. Smith G, Boyle C, Bradberry C, et al. AACP Pharmacy Practice Section/Professional Experience Programs Special Interest Group Preceptor Development Task Force Report, July 2003. Available at: (accessed February 26, 2007).

5. Marriott J, Taylor S, Simpson M, et al. Australian National Strategy for Pharmacy Preceptor Education and Support. Aust J Rural Health. 2005;13:83-90.

6. Achieving Preceptor Excellence. Available at: (accessed February 3, 2008).

7. Streiner DL & Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.

8. Langlois JP, Thach SB. Bringing Faculty Development to Community-Based Preceptors. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(3);150-155. doi:10.1097/00001888-200302000-00009.

9. Wilkes MS, Hoffman JR, Usatine R, Baillie S. An Innovative Program to Augment Community Preceptors’ Practice and Teaching Skills. Academic Medicine. 2006;81(4);332-341. doi:10.1097/00001888-200604000-00006.

10. Baldar RA, Brooks WB, Warfield ME, O’Shea K. A Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Perceptions and Needs Regarding the Precepting of Medical Students in Their Offices. Med Educ. 2001;35;789-795. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00980.x

11. Rainie L, Fox S, Horrigan J, et al. Internet: The Mainstreaming of Online Life. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Trends. 2005; 56-69.

12. Hocker D, Shoemaker A. Bridging Generational Gaps in the Workplace. Marketing and Planning Leadership Council. Original Inquiry Brief. 2004; 1-16.

13. Kahaleh A, Cannon B, Hritcko P, et al. Continuous Quality Improvement of Experiential Education: 2006-07 AACP Experiential Education Section Report. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(4);1-2.