Physicians’ generic drug prescribing behavior in district hospitals: a case of Phitsanulok, Thailand
Main Article Content
Keywords
Drugs, Generic, Drug Prescriptions, Thailand
Abstract
Generic prescribing is a sound approach to contain health care costs. However, little is known about physicians’ prescribing patterns in the Thai context.
Objective: To explore physicians’ generic prescription patterns in district hospitals.
Methods: Data was collected from three of the eight district hospitals between January and December 2008 (final response rate 37.5%). All participating hospitals were between 30 and 60-bed capacity. The researchers reviewed 10% of total outpatient prescriptions in each hospital.
Results: A total of 14,500 prescriptions were evaluated. The majority of patients were under universal health coverage (4,367; 30.1%), followed by senior citizens’ health insurance (2,734; 18.9%), and civil servant medical benefit schemes (2,419; 16.7%). Ten thousand six hundred and seventy-one prescriptions (73.6% of total prescriptions) had at least one medication. Among these, each prescription contained 2.85 (SD=1.69) items. The majority of prescriptions (7,886; 73.9%) were prescribed by generic name only. Drugs prescribed by brand names varied in their pharmacological actions. They represented both innovator and branded-generic items. Interestingly, a large number of them were fixed-dose combination drugs. All brand name prescriptions were off patented. In addition, none of the brand-name drugs prescribed were categorized as narrow therapeutic range or any other drug that had been reported to have had problems with generic substitution.
Conclusion: The majority of prescriptions in this sample were written by generic names. There is room for improvement in brand name prescribing patterns.
References
2. Tangcharoensathien V, Harnvoravongchai P, Pittayaransarit S, Kasemsup V. Health impacts of rapid economic changes in Thailand. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:789-807.
3. Tantivess S, Jierapong S, Jitraknatee A, Chakajnarodom S. Generic entry and drug expenditures of hospitals: case study of drugs approved by means of the new drug registration regulations. J Health Sci. 2002;11:167-176.
4. Fischer MA, Avron J. Economic consequences of underuse of generic drugs: evidence from Medicaid and implications for prescription drug benefit plan. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1051-1063.
5. Tantivess S. Generic substitution in public and private hospitals in Thailand. J Health Sci. 2002;11:32-43.
6. Burapadaja S, Kawasaki N, Kittipongpatana O, Ogata F. Study on variation in price of prescription medicines in Thailand. Yakuga Zasshi. 2007;127:515-526.
7. Heikkila R, Mäntyselkä P, Hartikainen-Herranen K, Ahonen R. Customers’ and physicians’ opinions of and experiences with generic substitution during the first year in Finland. Health Policy. 2007;82:366-374.
8. Alghasham AA. Generic drug prescribing in central Saudi Arabia: perceptions and attitudes of physicians. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29:24-29.
9. Al-Gedadi NA, Hassali MA, Shafie AA. A pilot survey on perceptions and knowledge of generic medicines among consumers in Penang, Malaysia. Pharm Pract (Internet). 2008;6(2):93-97.
10. Ministry of Public Health, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Drug Control. National Drug Policy B.E. 2536 (1993). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Ministry of Public Health; 1994. 50 p. [Transcript in Thai language]
11. Adair RF, Holmgren LR. 2005. Do drug samples influence resident prescribing behavior? A randomized trial. Am J Med. 2005;118:881-884.
12. General information regarding drug products [Internet]. Nonthaburi, Thailand: Ministry of Public Health, Food and Drug Administration, Drug Control Department; c2009 [cited 2009 Nov 28]. Available from: http://www2.fda.moph.go.th/consumer/drug/dcenter.asp.
13. Compilation of the Ministry Orders Regarding Pharmaceutical Formula Evocation [Internet]. Nonthaburi, Thailand: Ministry of Public Health, Food and Drug Administration, Drug Control Department; c2009. [cited 2009 Nov 28]. Available from: http://wwwapp1.fda.moph.go.th/drug/zone_law/law031.asp. [Transcript in Thai language]
14. Pope ND. Generic substitution of narrow therapeutic index drugs. US Pharmacist. 2009;34 (Generic Drug Review supplement): 12-19.
15. Rokstad K, Straand J, Fugelli P. General practitioners’ drug prescribing practice and diagnosis for prescribing: the Møre & Romsdal Prescription Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:485-494.
16. Hider P, Lay-Yee R, Davis P. Practitioners, patients, and their visits: a description of accident and medical (A&M) clinics in New Zealand 2001/2. New Zeal Med J. 2007;120:U2538.
17. Abraham J, Lewis G. Harmonising and competing for medicines regulation: how healthy are the European Union’s systems of drug approval? Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1655-1667.
18. Hill S, Johnson K. Emerging challenges and opportunities in drug registration and regulation in developing countries. London: DFIC Health Systems Resource Center. 47 p.
19. Assavakijsiri V. 2009. The development of systematic review of drug registers in Thailand. Report presented at: The development of drug register review system; 2009 Nov 25; Bangkok, Thailand. [Transcript in Thai language]
20. Carrin G. Drug prescribing: A discussion of its variability and (ir)rationality. Health Policy. 1987;7:73-94.
21. Lambert BL, Salmon JW, Stubbings J, Gilomen-Study G, Valuck RJ, Kezlarian K. Factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in a managed care setting: an exploratory investigation. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:1767-1779.
22. Steinman MA, Landefeld C, Gonzales R. Predictors of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in adult primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:719-725.
23. Stevenson FA, Greenfield SM, Jones M, Nayak A, Bradley C. GP’s perceptions of patient influence on prescribing. Fam Pract. 1999;16:255-261.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.